>>>>> "JS" == Jon Stanley writes: JS> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Alex Lancaster JS> <alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Surely you should always be able to add (at least a comment) to a bug >> if you are the reporter, even if it's another product: JS> Nah, lovely bugzilla product security there. Looks like it was moved to a different product after I filed. Nonetheless it seems odd that a reporter can't even comment on their own bug, otherwise how are you supposed to provide feedback about whether it's fixed? >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213764 JS> This should probably be a ticket in the infrastructure Trac JS> instance these days, if it's not already - but it looks like Jesse JS> fixed it?? Unfortunately not quite fixed, should I open up a ticket on infrastructure Trac (URL?). Here's the comment I was trying to add: > I have just committed code to pungi to re-enable repoview creation. > Repoview recently had some improvements made that will make it > easier for mirrors to digest and to shorten the time it takes to > generate content. Thanks it looks like, repoview is now enabled for Fedora 8 it appears: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/8/Everything/i386/os/repoview/ (but not for Fedora 7 for some reason) however it doesn't include updates, so it's not very useful for finding packages that have been added after the release. > Next I will be modifying the rawhide compose process to also have > repoview content. Seems this isn't enabled yet, no rawhide repoview where you might expect it: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
