Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 19:41 +0100, Mark wrote:
Hey,
I know i should have asked this earlier but the issue is just tiny.
Probably even just a rebuild of nautilus where you change one setting
in the gconf values.
Oke a while back i talked here about a thumbnail patch for nautilus.
That was with gnome 2.18
It got accepted gnome upstream and is in gnome since 2.20. (the code
isn't looking like what i submitted but that doesn't mather :)).
Since gnome 2.20 we have this new setting in nautilus->icon_view
(gconf-editor: /apps/nautilus/icon_view/thumbnail_size). By default
that value is set to: "96" while the default icon size of all the
desktop icons is: 48.
Now i was hoping we could change this to make the icons and the
thumbnails the same size. A desktop looks a lot more attractive when
the icons and thumbnails are the same size than when everything is
48x48 and just a few images have a thumbnail of 96x96 making it look
strange.
Hm, I always liked that the thumbnails are bigger and never found that
disruptive.
I wonder how difficult it would be to get a patch accepted upstream for adding a
second pulldown in the Preferences->Views pane which had Icon View, default icon
zoom level, and default thumbnail zoom level. The 'default' that option started
at would be a minor issue, but exposing that as configurable more easily might
be reasonable.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list