2008/3/8, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Mark <markg85@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So perhaps, because everyone will notice this, it might be best to make a vote. > > > > > > NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! > > This isn't how this works. Design decisions are based on a meritocracy > not a democracy. We have a desktop team, they make decisions about > design with regard to desktop issue based on a design roadmap that > guides their work. We aren't going to be making community wide votes > on crap like this.. this is not how meritocracies work. > > Governance structures like Fesco and the Board are here to drive > policy issues aimed at contributions.. we are not here to mandate > exactly which end-user features different groups of contributors > expose. > > -jef Just a "NO!" would have been fine. And for: "meritocracy" i had to google for it to find out what it means.. and i don't fully agree on it that.. but that all isn't the issue here. From the reply's here it looks like i can forget a FESCo vote and from what you said that would be the best thing to do. Otherwise FESCo could in the future get more requests like this which isn't FESCo's responsibility. And putting it upstream is something that i tried before and am not gonna attempt again (not anytime soon).. they seem to have a reason to keep it on 96x96 so let them have it. A bugzilla report (posted here earlier) has been made and it's now all in the hand of that maintainer. Want me to raise the severity of the rapport from low to medium or high? @Andrew Farris I fully agree on all of that! I think nautilus needs something like a "preview view" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
