Re: rawhide report: 20080307 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 20:35:14 -0800,
  Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Colorado Rob wrote:
> >Why does totem not show up as a broken dependency on this list?
> 
> Do you have any yum output for this?  If it is a conflict it won't show up 
> in that list.  What failed to happen for you that you think totem should be 
> there?

I think it has to do with totem-nautilus-xine going away. I had to uninstall
totem and then reinstall it to get it to work with yum. Probably there should
have been an obsoletes some where, but since I have been on rawhide for a
while now I wasn't sure that it was something from before rawhide. Because
if it wasn't, I am not sure if policy requires an obsoletes.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux