On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 05.03.08 15:08, Sunil Ghai (sunilkrghai@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:What do you mean by the blurred term "Zeroconf"? Fedora installs Avahi
> Hi,
>
> We currently don't have support for Zeroconf networks in
> system-config-network as like we do have in GNOME NetworkManager. Is there
> any work going on?
by default and NM does IPv4LL as a fallback when DHCP fails. What else
do you expect?
(Sure, afaik nm still uses its own ipv4ll code, and it should use
avahi-autoipd instead, but generally all the zeroconf technologies are
available by default. There's room for a lot of polishing,
though. Ubuntu's Zeroconf integration is admittedly much more refined)
Lennart (who happens to be "da Linux Zeroconf man")
--
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Well I was not aware of that NM checks for IPv4LL addresses. Being a student, I was just looking for a good project idea as I am learning about Zeroconf these days.
Now, I would like to know more about NM. :)
--
Sunil Ghai
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
