On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well, eventually the connection editor could potentially replace the GUI > > functionality of s-c-n and ifup/ifdown could be pointed at NM, but we're > > not there yet. There's a few more device types that NM would need to > > support (mainly PPPoE/PPPoATM connections, good ISDN, etc) before we > > could think about replacing anything. They are going to be parallel but > > mutually exclusive for the time being. Also there will be some people > > who won't ever want to use NM for some setups even though NM could work > > for them; but that's fine. > > Are those people...looking at using zeroconf. I get the reasoning for > avoiding NM in a more controlled networking situation... but zeroconf > seems like NM's bread and butter to me... but what the hell do i know. > > -jef How about static IPs and multiple concurrent networks? I couldn't get either to work with network manager in F8 -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
