On Wed March 5 2008, Jonathan Roberts wrote: > On 05/03/2008, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed March 5 2008, Till Maas wrote: > > > On Wed March 5 2008, Martin Nagy wrote: > > > > Squid got updated to squid-3.0.STABLE1 and there are some > > > > incompatibilities in configuration. For example, the old default > > > > config that was included in squid-2.6.STABLE17-1 won't work with the > > > > new squid. Is this worth noting in the release notes? > > > > > > yes, > > > > Eh, this was just my personal opinion. I just noticed that my similiar > > note about config file changes in pam_mount where removed from the alpha > > release notes. So maybe it is not worth noting. > > I feel this is probably worth noting, I'm not sure why it was removed > last time but I'll add a section perhaps for general technical points > testers should note? Hm, you should know it, I searched for the changeset that removed the note and it was done by you: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/Alpha/ReleaseNotes?action=diff&rev2=33&rev1=32 Maybe it was an accident then? The changeset is pretty big and there is no comment so I cannot tell. You also removed several other sections: - Intended Audience for Development Releases - Translations of Release Notes Maybe they should be readded to the beta release notes, too. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list