On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 17:58 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:32:32PM +0000, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 14:20 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > <snip> > > > I must have missed something, but if gnash 0.8.2 makes its way in fedora > > > it will be better than swfdec (though swfdec is better than 0.8.1). > > > > > > Where are those things discussed? > > > > They were "discussed" here. swfdec uses GStreamer for media playback, > > and supports the missing-plugins framework. gnash doesn't do the latter. > > Makes sense. Did somebody knowing that subject contact gnash developpers > to ask them to implement that feature? I didn't even know you could use GStreamer to do playback before today. swfdec is getting more traction in our circles as one part of it has been accepted into the GNOME desktop release (swfdec-gnome). We can always rethink the decisions when tihngs are more clear cut on either sides. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
