On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 23:59 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Not sure what advantage you see here. As to the first argument: if the > Koji build fails in a way that is reproducible on your own machine, that > says that you didn't bother to do a trial build before submitting to > Koji; which is surely not a habit that we should condone or encourage. Right, I'm talking about the case where it doesn't fail on one's own machine, due to build environment differences. > As to the second: the only way that separate build and test steps save > any resources is if a significant percentage of build jobs don't get > tested, which again is not something that I think we should encourage or > optimize for. I think it is OK if some rawhide builds don't get tested. What we should ensure is that builds that we're going to ship in a alpha/beta/real release are tested. Although really this discussion is kind of silly until we have some sort of testing framework. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
