Re: with F9, will we still need ALL X drivers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 01:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 10:51 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> What was the point of the metapackage, originally?  To install ALL
> >> drivers at install time and let firstboot sort it out?
> > 
> > To ensure that (for most cases), all drivers are installed and continue
> > to be updated as new drivers are added.  That way, if someone changes
> > out their video hardware, they don't get hosed by not having the driver
> > available.
> 
> Would it make sense for Anaconda to detect a laptop and only install the 
>   driver the system needs?

No.  Different install paths like this are just recipes for lots of pain
and unexpected bugs

Jeremy

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux