Re: Obsolete obsoletes/requires

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Leszek Matok wrote, at 03/01/2008 11:12 PM +9:00:
Dnia 2008-03-01, o godz. 08:14:19 seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
napisał(a):

no one is saying this isn't a valid part of rpm. I'm only saying that
using these kind of filedeps has a cost and I'd like to minimize that
cost as much as possible.
While we're on that, I don't have any numbers, but I think we have more of
Obsoletes: and Requires: that can't match any package in any supported Fedora
version (or any Fedora version at all). For example, compat-libgcc-296 has:
Obsoletes: gcc <= 2.96, compat-gcc
of which first hits RHL 7.3 and the second - Fedora 3 at most. I don't think
anyone is going to upgrade their system even from Fedora 3 (we're at 9), not to
mention 6-year-old RHL.

We are discussing these types of Obsoletes/Requires on "merge reviews" of
those packages (although I am not sure if someone has already begun to review gcc
merge review)

Regards,
Mamoru

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux