On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 02:46:41PM -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote: > On 02/29/2008 03:27 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 01:57:34PM -0500, Warren Togami wrote: >>> Has Co-Owners but no primary owner >>> ================================== >>> debootstrap >> >> I would prefer if somebody else was the primary maintainer. Is someone >> interested? > > I'm curious to know what you feel the difference is, because there really > shouldn't be any "primary" or "secondary" maintainers. There's just > maintainers and not. The primary maintainer has the last word (before escalation) and is supposed to take care of the package. The secondary packagers comment on bugs, and take care of the package when the first packager seems to be unresponsive. It is what I do, not a hard rule. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
