Bill Crawford pisze:
On 28/02/2008, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek<jakub.rusinek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kelly Miller pisze:
> You're joking, right?
No, I'm not. From users point, YaST-GTK is more readable and better
organized.
> I mean, two minutes with YaST-GTK and I'd
> already gotten sick of the fact that it acts like just about
> everything else in Gnome anymore; that the user should only be able to
> reach the minimum of options and anything else should be buried.
You use KDE, right?
As do I. You have a problem with KDE, right? It's bad? It offers
options and you think that people don't want options => must not allow
configuration?
KDE users think that many options, with clutter in UI are good, but they
even do not use them and do not need them.
Believe, I was KDE user, who switched in search of something better.
> And it's a fact that the GTK installer is utterly brain-dead.
Don't be rude... Most of people do not require LOAD of options, but they
expect simple "just works", without hassle.
I find it rude that you're suggesting that having options => doesn't
"just work".
Did I said this? No. You, KDE people always brag something.
It's extremely frustrating.
If do not use something, then be silent.
And about system-* tools for KDE - KDE version can have more options as
you will "need" them.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
