On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 22:41 +0100, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote: > > > We've seen it all, on this very list, already. > > > > Who said Ubuntu is modern :> ? > > > > As we have most of that features or were GOING to have them, we would > > have different ideas on such list. > > Went through some of the interesting ones: > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/138/ > Filed as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435402 > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/95/ > See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureBluetooth > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/2/ > See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFingerprint > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/84/ > Easy to add, file a bug against gnome-settings-daemon if you're bothered > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/111/ > Needs upstream approval/discussions > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/204/ > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RandrSupport given the right > support for the video card chipset > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/161/ > This is ongoing. HAL support in X should make this easier for us in > Fedora 9. > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/82/ > Not really an idea, but GPS integration is planned for GNOME (see the > geoclue project), and hardware support for the Bluetooth ones as above > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/179/ > Already planned in GNOME Scan, not sure about the status > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/208/ > That's already something people want to work on in GNOME, there's a lot > of discussion on how this should integrate with the online desktop, etc. > See the GNOME bugzilla (about-me lives in the control-center) > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/168/ > Same reason ndiswrapper isn't in Fedora, pretty much, although it lives > in user-space. > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/174/ > The drivers seem to be done by linuxtv people, so it's only a matter of > time (from our POV) before they show up in the upstream kernel > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/185/ > That was already rejected by upstream > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/76/ > Already in development: > http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/02/17/new-column-wise-nautilus-view-user-data-backup-replay/ > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/241/ > Google Calendar integration got worked on for last year's SoC for GNOME > I'm pretty sure CalDav and other such protocols are being worked on > upstream > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/1/ > Hard one because all the solutions seem to have been half-finished > before. Didn't we have this as a Fedora SoC as well? > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/80/ > We don't have as much of a problem as we have sub-menus for those, but > it's on-going work upstream and for us. > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/28/ > Yes please. OpenSync sucks, and I'm tip-toeing > Conduit/gnome-phone-manager integration for F10, for a small part of > that puzzle. > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/240/ > Applications can provide this if they want/need it, file bugs against > specific applications > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/120/ > Agreed it's a good idea, but this btnx is far from being the right > solution. See also: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140279 > Should be easier to fix with the HAL support in the X server > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/129/ > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=519438 > > - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/132/ > Bugs should be filed against applications that should have joypad > support but don't (gnome-games!) > See also http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=519439 All the more reason to consolidate the effort. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
