Andrew Farris wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
The Firefox addon update system is far from awesome when you're the one
who has to install and update Firefox extensions manually on a pool of
systems because users don't bother (additionally that's one reason
Firefox fares so bad in the enterprise — geek-oriented installation
system without any provision for centralised management).
And this argument really does not hold water. Unless I'm missing
something, the extension deployment system in IE7 is nearly identical
to Firefox, so I think the realistic reason firefox does not fair well
in the enterprise is because it lacks support for activex sites (among
other things microsoftish), and many businesses contract out internal
web application development to.. cheap activex sites.
Really? Last I checked activex was used pretty much exclusively for
virus transfer (oh, and the windows flash plugin).
--CJD
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
