On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 07:59:21PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > People who choose to do the development did it in whatever toolkit and > language they preferred. Nothing is stopping you from duplicating that work > in whatever toolkit you prefer or even porting Yast to Fedora but writing > in one toolkit is not discriminating any desktop environment. It might not > be ideal but works fine. It's probably still worth checking out. Worst case after lots of work the UI library forces some crappy subset of Qt/GTK/text on all the config tools (Inherently such a library will always limit what you can do with the UI) + extra bloat (since you'll still need GTK or Qt) Best case current functionality is kept (for little conversion work), people get their native UI look and we get a kick-ass text UI as a bonus. Reality? Something in the middle, I'm sure ;) -- Pekka Pietikainen -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
