Re: mono-core conflicts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Debarshi Ray schrieb:
> Trying to install mono-devel on Fedora 8 x86_64 leads to a transaction error:
> 
> #  yum -y --enablerepo=fedora --enablerepo=updates install mono-devel
> [...]
> Dependencies Resolved
> 
> =============================================================================
>  Package                 Arch       Version          Repository        Size
> =============================================================================
> Installing:
>  mono-devel              x86_64     1.2.5.1-3.fc8    updates           1.6 M
>  mono-devel              i386       1.2.5.1-3.fc8    updates           1.6 M
> Installing for dependencies:
>  mono-core               i386       1.2.5.1-3.fc8    updates            12 M
> 
> Transaction Summary
> =============================================================================
> Install      3 Package(s)
> Update       0 Package(s)
> Remove       0 Package(s)
> 
> Total download size: 15 M
> [...]
> Transaction Check Error:
>   file /usr/bin/smcs from install of mono-core-1.2.5.1-3.fc8.i386
> conflicts with file from package mono-core-1.2.5.1-3.fc8.x86_64
> 
> Error Summary
> -------------
> 
> Is this worth filing a bug? I could not find something similar in
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?product=Fedora&version=&version=7&version=8&component=mono&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=FAILS_QA&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&bug_status=POST&bug_status=PASSES_QA&bug_status=CLOSED&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=
> 
> Cheers,
> Debarshi

Hi,

I do not understand what happens there: You obviously need mono-core for
development. But do you really need both architectures? Why does yum
think so? And if, why should mono-devel.i386 depend on mono-core.i386
and not just on _any_ mono-core package?
Looks like at least one yum bug and/or package bug to me.

regards

christoph


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHwdO3hMBO4cVSGS8RAuBYAJ9kVsPdLyagDh3sNw8W0StjEPXr7gCeKToJ
MGMjRnjwc3BJtJG1xebY/08=
=Gtgc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux