On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > what do you exactly mean with "too ugly to live"? Is it that fragile bad > > code or does it just not fit the kernel styling guidelines? > > In terms of accessing hardware virt capabilities, there is already a generic > kernel module to expose hardware virtualization driver to userspace apps - it > is called KVM. If virtualbox needs access to hardware virt them it should > use this existing driver. > > > > And if the quality is just not good enough to get into fedora, what > > efforts would be needed to fix that? > > It should use the KVM module driver, and if the current functionality in > KVM is not sufficient then VirtualBox should work with upstream to address > the limitations. Having multiple kernel modules for virtualization does > not help anyone. > Are Xen guys aware of this? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
