On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 14:28 +0100, Denis Leroy wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 01:40:00AM +0100, Christoph Höger wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > > > I've noticed that there seems to be no review request for virtualbox so > > > far. I think it would be great to have this opensource vmware killer in > > > the repos but currently I am not quite sure if I could manage to package > > > it all alone. > > > > > > Is someone willing to support me in this area. I would do the main work > > > and mainly need someone to ask dumb questions and make sure things go > > > the fedora way. Maybe someone who is already packaging some virt related > > > stuff? > > > > The kernel module for this is way too ugly to live. > > Maybe this should be added to the new package guidelines wiki, next to > the "must be legal" and "must build" entries : "code must not be ugly". > ... Given the fact that kernel code tends to be far more complicated and far less debug-able (as in, you usually fix bugs by reading and reading the code 900 times) - yes, you need the code to be clean and well documented. - Gilboa -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
