On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 10:06 -0500, Austin Acton wrote: > On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 12:28 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Some remarks (based on TFA, not on the mailinglist post): > > > > > > * sensors working with lm_sensors > > > > Note: I'm an upstream lm_sensors contributer and co-maintainer of most sensor > > related packages in Fedora. > > > > About lm_sensors not being installed by default, thats because for the average > > users lm_sensors is not usable as it requires manual configuration. > > > > About telling the user that he should run sensors-detect after installing > > lm_sensors, when and how do you envision this being told to the user? > > Urpmi spits a message out to the command line post-install: > > [austin@blackbox ~]$ cat /usr/share/doc/lm_sensors/README.urpmi > * To use this package, you'll have to launch "sensors-detect" as root, > and ask few questions. > No need to modify startup files as shown at the end, all will be done. > * Special note for via686a and i2c-viapro : if you dont see the values, > you probably have a PCI conflict. > It will be corrected in next kernel. Change > the /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors to use i2c-isa + via686a > (or i2c-viapro + another sensor) > > [Sorry for the Mandriva English.] > In the case that the package in question is installed via rpmdrake, > urpmi message pop up in a graphical text box. Yikes! The Mandriva English, it is contagious! ... a urpmi message will pop up in a graphical text box. /o\ Austin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
