On 21/02/2008, Stephen Warren <s-t-rhbugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In my case. I'm running these: > > * Fedora Core 3 (yes, that's ancient) EOL, irrelevant. > * Cygwin (now, I see 2.27.xx is available there) So, irrelevant > * RHEL4/CentOS4 (via rpmforge, since the package isn't in EPEL) RPMForge should update their packages then. > * RHEL5/CentOS5 (via rpmForge, since the package isn't in EPEL) > Package has been submitted for EPEL for EL-5, and so it should appear there shortly, I imagine (see BZ #431389). Presumably a branch could also be created for EL-4, too. Further, updating to 2.27 brings compatibility with OSX. So, I fail to see the problem. > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
