On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 21:16 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 11:48 +1000, Jens Petersen wrote: > > Evolution is different enough from regular GNOME applications to be > > basically a different platform > > Can you elaborate on this? Evolution is an official component of the > GNOME desktop so I don't understand what you mean by "regular GNOME > applications." I believe there was a similar thread about Epiphany vs. Firefox being default a while ago there. Epiphany is a default GNOME component, but Firefox is default, right? Actually, I don't have an opinion on this -- difficulty of deciding about defaults seems to me bigger than relevance of what's being the default as it's so easy to switch. And I'm a happy Firefox and Evolution user :) -- Lubomir Kundrak (Red Hat Security Response Team) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
