Re: ISO 216 vs U.S. paper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2008-02-19, 16:44 GMT, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
> Still, it's definately the way to go, why have an extra library 
> when glibc has everything that needed. Patching libpaper to use 
> LC_PAPER if /etc/paper.conf doesn't exist (and even trying to 
> get that upstream to do that with their libpaper) might be 
> useful too, not that anything in Fedora seems to even use it 
> currently.

I was in my former life Debianist and as such I know that there 
was a huge effort to move every printing program to libpaper 
(e.g., IIRC it was Release-Critical Bug not to use libpaper when 
you print), so there may be a lot of patches already available.  
But is it necessary?

Matěj

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux