On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:45:11PM +0000, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 21:31 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:04:06PM -0500, Warren Togami wrote: > > > Below is a current list of orphaned ownership packages that are still in > > > the rawhide collection. The third column is the last person to built the > > > package. Some of these packages like avahi obviously need a new owner > > > because we depend on it. Others it might be a good idea to drop before F9 > > > Beta (pending FESCO discussion). > > > > > > Any comments? > > > > > > Warren Togami > > > > > > agg-2.5-6.fc9 dist-f9 pertusus > > > > Indeed, I am the de facto maintainer. I just granted myself ownership. > > > > There is something really strange, there are 12 co-maintainers who have > > watchcommit and commit or only commit (though anybody can commit..) > > I am not sure they are all really interested. > > Probably none of them. Those are people from the desktop team at RH, > where the package used to be maintained for Core. When core and extras > were merged, all the people in the Desktop team got "maintainership" on > all the packages handled by colleagues in the team, as we don't usually > fine-grain ownership quite that much. > > I don't think anyone cares quite that much about agg anymore ;) I guess that the gnash maintainer in OLPC cares, maybe the former owner also cares (though it is not that clear). Should I revoke their commit rights (given that everybody can commit anyway)? -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
