Re: Massrebuilds for GCC 4.3 coming soon to a buildsystem near you!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating <jkeating <at> redhat.com> writes:
> We're also still discussing a way to allow maintainers to opt-out of an
> autorebuild.

Well, here's 2 exclusion requests with rationale:

* qt (Qt 3, I hope this is fixed in qt4 already, needs checking): 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433235
Qt plugins are identified with a "build key" intended to guarantee matching 
ABIs between the plugin and the application loading the plugin. Unfortunately, 
if Qt is built with GCC 4.3, plugins currently end up with "g++-3.*" instead 
of "g++-4.*" in their build key, which breaks binary compatibility. I'd really 
like this to get fixed before a Qt built with GCC 4.3 ends up in the repo 
(again, Rex Dieter untagged the current one).

* knetworkmanager: The knetworkmanager in CVS is a snapshot of the 
KNetworkManager port to NM 0.7 which is still very incomplete, so it was 
untagged, the one we have in Rawhide now is a metapackage which shouldn't need 
a rebuild anyway. Rebuilding from CVS would mean reintroducing the unstable 
snapshot.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux