On 05/01/2008, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > There are packages that are shipped part of texlive, though texlive is > not the upstream for those packages. Among those, some are in fedora > texlive, as an exception because they were in tetex previously. > I personally don't want to maintain them since I maintain enough > packages already, but I can review them. > > > In texlive but should be separate: > dvpdfm > http://gaspra.kettering.edu/dvipdfm/ > [snip] > As a side note, dvipdfmx maybe should be packaged from the real > upstream > http://project.ktug.or.kr/dvipdfmx/ > but it is not obvious since it is used in texlive. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
