> For installing gnome-build 0.2.1 from F8 updates, I had to remove > anjuta 2.2.0 That is because the soname of the libraries provided by gnome-build has changed. The version of Anjuta that is available in the repositories is really old and was not built against these new libraries. > In file included from ../libanjuta/anjuta-shell.h:29, > from anjuta.c:22: > ../libanjuta/anjuta-preferences.h:24:25: error: glade/glade.h: No such file > or directory > In file included from ../libanjuta/anjuta-shell.h:29, > from anjuta.c:22: That is because of a problem in one of the Anjuta Makefiles. > /usr/bin/ld: > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/libbfd.a(format.o): > relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making > a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/libbfd.a: > could not read symbols: Bad value > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status I have also encountered this, but have not fixed it yet. Any suggestions would be much appreciated. > This the the .src.rpm I am using, in case someone can take a look at it: > > http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/anjuta-2.2.3-13.fc8.src.rpm Please try the following: Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/anjuta.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/anjuta-2.2.3-1.fc8.src.rpm It contains a couple of patches, one of which fixes the glade.h related build failure. I expect them to work on F-8 and hopefully on F-7 too. Cheers, Debarshi -- "From what we get, we can make a living; what we give, however, makes a life." -- Arthur Ashe -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
