Re: Git has too many freaking dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 16, 2008 3:44 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2008 4:21 AM, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Friday 15 February 2008, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> >
> > > Not to bicker of the potential naming, but how about just calling it
> > > git-meta so there is no ambiguity.
> >
> > I think there's plenty of ambiguity in "git-meta".  If the intent is to
> > install all git-* with this, call it "git-all", "git-everything" or just drop
> > the whole metapackage and set up a git comps group.
>
> +1 i just didn't like git-suite

As a naming scheme, X-suite has a certain elegance to it, in my
opinion, but that all boils down to taste.

Since we already have a consistent scheme for such a thing, comps
seems like a better solution for Fedora to me.

-Yaakov

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux