Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthew Farrellee (mfarrellee+fedora@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
It can happen whenever a user process shares its name with a service's
process. This just tends to be a common thing with my package.
Why not generate patches for the functions to support the behavior you
want, and we can see what issues they may cause on a global level? That
seems preferable to re-implementing large portions of it.
Bill
Those interested can check out:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433018
Best,
matt
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list