Re: FYI: NI_MAXHOST glibc problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:

> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5737

Sounds like the discussion should be taken there. It 
would be interesting to know how many of the Fedora
build failures are from this change. Matt, would you
mind grepping for "error: 'NI_MAXHOST' undeclared" ?

The alpine build failure is here:
http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results-core/i386/alpine-1.00-2.fc9.src.rpm/result/build.log

The important lines are:
ip_unix.c: In function 'ip_sockaddrtostring':
ip_unix.c:81: error: 'NI_MAXHOST' undeclared (first use in this
function)
ip_unix.c:81: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
ip_unix.c:81: error: for each function it appears in.)

Please note that alpine (nee pine) is ported to an extremely
wide variety of platforms, so it is probably a good test case
of real-world portable vs theoretical standard
http://www.washington.edu/alpine/acquire/


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux