On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:39:54PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:04:22 +0100 > > Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] > > > > Does this looks like a plan acceptable by the Fedora lead? > > > > Opinions, comments? > > > My first impression is... "ok so there's now a formal process, and the > > result is that there is no branch ever that uses this". The chances of > > finding sufficient capable volunteers for even the base package set > > is... near zero. > > In calculus they called this number \epsilon ;-) You cannot say if you haven't asked. It was in one of the points of the proposal, to start only if there is a maintainer willing to maintain each of the packages in the mandatory and default packages of the Core+Base comps groups. > There just seems not to be enough /real/ demand to keep it running for a > reasonable amount of time. The demand is more a "it sure sounds nice to be > able to run the same Fedora for 5 years, in case the versions in between > turn out duds", but very few really contemplate suffering such outdated > stuff; and in my experience people who run old versions are also the same > who don't ever apply any updates. The point is not here. As long as people are willing to do some work it is relevant to let them do it. The demand is irrelevant here, we are producing a 'Public Good'. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
