Re: a plan for updates after end of life

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:41:55PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > The solution for security fixes won't be necessarily backports. It should
> > be (in general) updates. If the update is not backward compatible and the
> > maintainer want to do backports, fine. Otherwise it will be an update.
> 
> People who really want to keep running the older version do so because they
> /don't/ want the updates...

You can draft a proposal to have that. Especially now than I retired
mine.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux