On Saturday 09 February 2008 08:34:40 pm Andrew Farris wrote: > Lex Hider wrote: > > Should all comments for bugs closed as duplicates be added to the > > original bug. > > > > It seems to me that useful information is lost when closing bugs as > > duplicate. > > > > Here's an example that lead me to think about this: > > > > ORIGINAL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237393 > > DUPLICATE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355151 > > > > While it is clearly a duplicate bug, to me it seems clear that the > > duplicate bug contains a lot of useful and relevant information. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Lex. > > That might be a bad mess for bugs that are marked duplicate accidentally, > incorrectly, or just fat-fingered as duplicate of the wrong bug number. It > would cause a weird mixing of comments that don't follow easily from the > previous as well. > > -- > Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net > gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B > 1DF3 No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - > Daniel Geer ---- > ---- Couldn't removing a duplicate remove comments just like I'm suggesting that marking duplicate add them. Is the use case of bug triager making a mistake a valid enough reason to discount this feature? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
