Re: to autodownload or not to autodownload

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Trond Danielsen <trond.danielsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2008 10:50 PM, Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2008-02-08, 18:57 GMT, Trond Danielsen wrote:
> > > 1. Online-desktop: The world of free software has "fought"
> > > proprietary software for many years, only to partner up with
> > > the WWW behemoth that Google is.
> >
> > Nobody partnered with anybody.
> 
> Sorry for the wrong choice of word. The purpose of the argument was
> that Fedora already depend on proprietary services

Which ones?

>                                                    and software

None that I know of...

>                                                                 which
> makes the argument against the autodownloader invalid.

There is no basis for this assertion I can see.

[...]

> > "Is this really clueless-are-let-out day?"

> Daily beating with a cluestick is the path to enlightenment :-)

In the end, the arm doing the beating gets tired (or its owner bored).
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile               Fax:  +56 32 2797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux