Re: to autodownload or not to autodownload

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Valent Turkovic <valent.turkovic <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > You didn't understand me or you don't have all the info... look at
> > older posts on this subject. Somebody posted on mailinglist saying
> > that there was a court decision in US that would make this
> > "contributary infringement" go away. That is what I'm saying to check
> > with Fedora Legal because this was couple months ago.

> The way Novell has interpreted this decision can be seen in this
> screenshot: http://de.opensuse.org/Bild:YaSTCommunityRepositories.png
> Under "Community Repositories", they now have this list of third-party
> repositories, which also includes ones which ship patent-encumbered
> software.

SUSE is a /german/ company (wholly owned by Novell, but still), they have
no operations in the US (that much I gleaned from some SCOX nonsense
against them that was commented on Groklaw), so they don't have to put up
with idiotic US laws.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile               Fax:  +56 32 2797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux