Re: call for brave ext4 testers in F9, with caveats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> On 2/4/08, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 3) misc stuff - I've not yet tested ext4 over an encrypted block device,
>>> or even over an lvm volume.  There may be some stack issues on x86 boxes
>>> still, I'm working on slimming that down.  I hope that more real-world
>>> use will shake out any remaining problems.
>> I temporarily lost my sanity and tried installing ex4 over an
>> encrypted lvm volume.  Of course, it didn't work, 

Oh, ye of little faith! :)

>> I get the following
>> message when it tried to mount the root partition:

FWIW, if you did this with all rawhide bits, it *should* have worked;
(rawhide) anaconda should have called (rawhide) mkfs.ext3 in a manner
which should have set the flag that the (rawhide) kernel is looking for.

This was not the case?

-Eric

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux