On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:08:33 +0530 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You could just submit the ks file to rel-eng and see what feedback > you get. Forming a SIG is recommended to coordinate efforts but not > strictly necessary. My XFCE spin got approved recently and there was > no SIG attached to it although I did talk to the Fedora XFCE > maintainers and upstream XFCE developers among others. I would strongly prefer that there was a SIG in place, as with these extra spins we're looking upon the SIG team to be doing all the QA work on it, and eventually doing the actual spin production. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
