On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 23:48:41 +0100 Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:23:05PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > We don't need a general rule. We need you to bring up these specific > > examples when they happen and FESCo can deal with those at that time. > > That's what the general rule would boil down to anyway. > > I have something like 9 of such bugs, I don't think that it scales well > to ask FESCO. And what to ask to FESCO? Hello, I have all those bugs not > addressed, please do something? Maybe ther may be a better solution? 9 bugs for 9 separate maintainers? Or one maintainer with 9 bugs? Or? Seriously, what would you consider reasonable to do in situations like you described (but still haven't given specifics to)? If you have an actual proposal, we can certainly review it. Personally, I find situations like that to differ in the details enough that I'm not sure there is a sufficient general solution. It seems to me asking FESCo to review those on a case-by-case basis would cover most things. It won't scale to hundreds of bugs or dozens of maintainers, but if that starts being the case we've failed elsewhere. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
