Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Wednesday 06 February 2008 04:13:38 am Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Please don't BR kdelibs-devel or kdebase-devel (at least not in the >> current transition period), instead BR kdelibs3-devel/kdebase3-devel for >> KDE 3 or kdelibs4-devel/kdebase4-devel (or kdebase-workspace-devel if >> that's what the package needs, kdebase has been split) for KDE 4. The >> kdelibs/kdebase packages have the appropriate Provides to make this work. > > Ooh, shiny. When did that start being the case? for starters, see: http://rdieter.livejournal.com/4341.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2007-November/msg00005.html I'm sure we could to a better job of documenting this in the fedora/wiki somewhere. > >Also, is that the case for > RHEL, for the benefit of those who might also want to builds their stuff > for EPEL? No, but if you ask Than real nicely, I'd hope he'd add the appropriate Provides: in RHEL packaging someday too. :) -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
