On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:45:12PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:42:59 +0100 > Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Dependency loops are not an issue, the Requires(.) should lead to the > > correct ordering. > > Except loops do happen, and rpm has to make a decision at some point > where to break that loop. Where the loop was being broken was not > great, as it lead to the problem in the bug report. I may be wrong, but I think that the loop is badly broken because the Requires(.) are missing or not right. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
