Re: rpms/java-1.7.0-icedtea/devel java-1.7.0-icedtea-jhat.patch, 1.6, 1.7 sources, 1.30, 1.31

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:46:34 -0500
fedora-extras-commits@xxxxxxxxxx (Lillian Angel (langel)) wrote:

> Author: langel
> 
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/java-1.7.0-icedtea/devel
> In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16892
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	java-1.7.0-icedtea-jhat.patch sources 
> Log Message:
> Uploaded new sources and updated patches.

...snipp...

> diff -u -r1.30 -r1.31
> --- sources	8 Jan 2008 20:38:45 -0000	1.30
> +++ sources	5 Feb 2008 17:46:23 -0000	1.31
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  ce13ee63357a699ad327d362230cc2f5  java-access-bridge-1.19.2.tar.gz
>  abee6aad1525bee3d45a13d0adf859c9  mauve-2007-09-12.tar.gz
>  254bfa2360efb5374439f9b1738c7b22  openjdk-b24-fedora.zip
> -2c1183cef14826c55ae13bc8c56e2e9d  icedtea-1.5.tar.gz
>  7a0c160c03012cd40957a7a112e25038  mauve_tests
> +337b0f3d04749df35f54747618e599ca  icedtea-1.5.tar.gz
> 

I'm a bit confused by this... Upstream has a icedtea-1.5.tar.gz that
they released on Jan 3rd. 

This version (also called 1.5) has a number of changes to it... 

I suggest either: 

- If this is a svn snapshot or something, use that versioning and pull
the svn version. 

- If this is local changes, use the upstream 1.5 version and apply a
patch with your local changes? 

Or am I missing something here?

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux