On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:46:34 -0500 fedora-extras-commits@xxxxxxxxxx (Lillian Angel (langel)) wrote: > Author: langel > > Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/java-1.7.0-icedtea/devel > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16892 > > Modified Files: > java-1.7.0-icedtea-jhat.patch sources > Log Message: > Uploaded new sources and updated patches. ...snipp... > diff -u -r1.30 -r1.31 > --- sources 8 Jan 2008 20:38:45 -0000 1.30 > +++ sources 5 Feb 2008 17:46:23 -0000 1.31 > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > ce13ee63357a699ad327d362230cc2f5 java-access-bridge-1.19.2.tar.gz > abee6aad1525bee3d45a13d0adf859c9 mauve-2007-09-12.tar.gz > 254bfa2360efb5374439f9b1738c7b22 openjdk-b24-fedora.zip > -2c1183cef14826c55ae13bc8c56e2e9d icedtea-1.5.tar.gz > 7a0c160c03012cd40957a7a112e25038 mauve_tests > +337b0f3d04749df35f54747618e599ca icedtea-1.5.tar.gz > I'm a bit confused by this... Upstream has a icedtea-1.5.tar.gz that they released on Jan 3rd. This version (also called 1.5) has a number of changes to it... I suggest either: - If this is a svn snapshot or something, use that versioning and pull the svn version. - If this is local changes, use the upstream 1.5 version and apply a patch with your local changes? Or am I missing something here? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
