Re: yum and yum-updatesd in Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le dimanche 03 février 2008 à 10:38 -0900, Jeff Spaleta a écrit :

> If we continue to require that groups don't overlap like this,

We don't. I removed the overlap check from our comps filter last year
because the list was getting too long, no one cared and it was drowning
other error messages.

>  But for a groupremove command to work,
> rationally, there has to be some extra information tracked about why a
> package was installed, so when its uninstalled as part of a
> groupremove, its not uninstalled if it belongs to another installed
> group. 

In other words another database somewhere. Which the yum/rpm developpers
are deeply afraid of.

Like rpm grouping, metadata translation handling, etc installation
source tracking is something that should be implemented properly someday
but is indefinitely postoned because it's so invasive. I just hope it
finaly happens.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux