On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 02:36:46AM -0800, Andrew Farris wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> Hi all! >>> >>> /me is a bit puzzled >>> >>> On "28 Jan 2008 22:14:47 -0700" kernel-2.6.23.14-64.fc7 was shipped as >>> update: >>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-January/msg00968.html >>> >>> Some minutes ago on "02 Feb 2008 02:01:59 -0700" kernel-2.6.23.14-60.fc7 >>> was shipped as update: >>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00061.html >> >> Just wanted to report the same thing, glad it's not just me that >> thinks 60<64. ;) >> >> AFAIK, -60 wasn't even a test release, or was it (???). BTW FC6 was >> the last release to send test update notificatiopn to fedora-test, >> this seems to have been discontinued since F7. Not a Good Think IMHO. > > Are you sure you're receiving mail from fedora-test? F7 and F8 > updates-testing announcements are going out. > > This mail on 1/24 and 3 more like it since: > > The following builds has been pushed to Fedora 7 updates-testing > > R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51-1.3.1-3 > b43-fwcutter-010-2.fc7 > [lots more] Yes, I am, I am not referring to digest reports, but individual reports that you would catch by Subject. But perhaps there were too many notifications and the individual reports were therefore removed. Anyway -60 isn't mentioned on these digests either (or maybe it wil at the end of the day). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp15wgRJlOLf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
