On Jan 31, 2008 12:05 PM, Michel Salim <michel.sylvan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Jan 31, 2008 12:08 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Nils Philippsen (nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > Is this intentional (i.e. does it serve a purpose)? Otherwise the > > > depsolvers should be fixed as this makes splitting up packages rather > > > painful. > > > > If you have syslog-ng, rsyslog, and something else all obsoleting > > sysklogd, I don't think you want to automatically install all of them. > > > > (Then again, that may not be a proper usage of Obsoletes.) > > > Seems like we want a field like "Suggests:". That would accomodate > Jef's idea of offering users to install missing packages (in this > case, the set of suggested packages - installed packages) easily. > Isn't that in rpm5? How about moving to that.. <runs and hides under rocks>. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
