On 01/30/2008 04:42 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 01/26/2008 05:05 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
Here are some stats of todays re-spin against the latest f9-alpha
bits and
livecd configs. It looks like our desktop spin lost 2mb overnight,
while everything else got bigger. In the diff below, I also include
a list
of packages that have shrunk since F8.
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.6G 2008-01-26 02:28
F9-Alpha-Developer-20080126.0.iso
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 767M 2008-01-26 02:42
F9-Alpha-FEL-i686-20080126.0.iso
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0G 2008-01-26 15:25
F9-Alpha-games-i686-20080126.0.iso
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 712M 2008-01-26 01:18
F9-Alpha-i686-20080126.0.iso
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 688M 2008-01-26 01:46
F9-Alpha-KDE-i686-20080126.0.iso
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 801M 2008-01-26 02:02
F9-Alpha-KDE-x86_64-20080126.0.iso
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 768M 2008-01-26 01:35
F9-Alpha-x86_64-20080126.0.iso
Whatever happened to the Desktop spin?
The desktop spin has never been called that in the filename. What you
need is
F9-Alpha-i686-20080126.0.iso
I'm not talking about the default "Fedora" spin which provides a desktop
(and which also lets you install server stuff). The "Desktop" spin was
the targeted desktop spin of packages, and with tweaks such as
NM-on-by-default, etc.
Is that really what that iso file gives me?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
