>>>>> "CI" == Christian Iseli <Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx> writes: CI> FE-NEW packages stats: CI> - 719 open tickets CI> - 510 tickets with no activity in eight weeks CI> - 31 tickets with no activity in four weeks Note: this includes merge reviews. Outside of the merge reviews on the hit list (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/426387) most reviewers are concentrating on the non-merge review tickets as neglecting these potentially loses us both community members and new software. Out of the 720 non-tracker Package Review tickets with no fedora-review flag set that happened to be there when I looked, 487 of them were merge reviews, leaving 233 review tickets, and of those 46 are blocked waiting on guidelines. (There are almost certainly more which should be marked as such.) This includes all of the Java packages. Plus there are quite a few which are unreviewable for other reasons (submitter not responding, submitter has been informed that package is unacceptable but refuses to fix it, etc.) So on the whole we're actually doing really well. It's only the merge reviews and the unreviewable Java package dump that make the figure seem so large. CI> FE-NEEDSPONSOR packages stats: CI> - 27 open tickets CI> - 2 tickets with no activity in eight weeks BTW, those two tickets are https://bugzilla.redhat.com/192436 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/250747 if anyone wants to have a look. I have pinged most of the really old tickets already but never got around to those two. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
