Alex Lancaster wrote: > Here's the full list of packages broken either directly or indirectly > by this change: Hm... I'd done a "repoquery --whatrequires libsoup" and only came up with 2 non-GNOME packages (libtranslate, which I've now sent the patch for to Dmitry, and libsyncml, which I've submitted a patch upstream for, http://libsyncml.opensync.org/ticket/130). Apparently repoquery lies though. :-/ > bmpx-0.40.13-7.fc9.i386 requires libsoup-2.2.so.8 > buoh-0.8.2-2.fc7.i386 requires libsoup-2.2.so.8 > drivel-2.1.1-0.3.20071130svn.fc9.i386 requires libsoup-2.2.so.8 > hardinfo-0.4.2.3-1.fc9.i386 requires libsoup-2.2.so.8 > 1:logjam-4.5.3-9.fc8.3.i386 requires libsoup-2.2.so.8 > twitux-0.60-2.fc9.i386 requires libsoup-2.2.so.8 I'll look in to these. In the meantime, libsoup 2.4 and 2.2 are supposed to be parallel-installable (although as of libsoup 2.3.0.1, they aren't completely, because of conflicting documentation files), so a compat package would work. -- Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
