On Jan 28, 2008 1:16 PM, Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Jan 28, 2008 1:50 PM, Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2008-01-28, 15:32 GMT, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > > On Jan 28, 2008 9:28 AM, Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> FYI: Nokia wants to buy Trolltech: > > >> > > >> http://trolltech.com/company/newsroom/announcements\ > > >> /press.2008-01-28.4605718236 > > > > > > I think it is past-tense now, http://trolltech.com/28012008/28012008 > > > > Isn't this weird -- what about their using Gnome in Maemo? > > Not to knock Gnome or GTK+, but QT is a more robust framework. QT in > C++ is easier to program than GTK+ in C. QT has alot of constructs in > it for data containers and multithreading, which if I understand > correctly, are better than GTK+ on a technical standpoint. From a > desktop perspective, things like application resizing and other > graphical aspects 'perform better' than GTK+ programs. I'm sure > Benjamin Kreuter is going to argue the flexibility of KParts as well. > > I think Nokia either might just be hedging their bets, or actually > plan on using a QT framework for something. > > -Yaakov Also, Qt is _alot_ more than a GUI toolkit. As far as I understand, Gtk+ is just a GUI toolkit -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
