On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:13:39 -0500 David Mansfield <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think Fedora LTS would be: > - planned and built into the Fedora cycle and finally implemented > - only releases planned in advance to be LTS releases would be LTS > - there would only be one (or two) outstanding LTS releases at a time And you create the same problem. They won't be frequent enough to support today's hardware, and also if you constantly just do new versions of everything you lose the ability to support it long term as too much churn breaks things. To be fair, RHEL/CentOS does do limited hardware enablement in the update releases, like 5.0, 5.1, etc... -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
