Package request: MICO or OmniORB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi everyone --

I noticed that there aren't any C++ ORBs packages with Fedora.  Although there 
is a C++ binding for ORBit2, it is not package, and worse than that, it is 
broken (the code it generates is not valid C++ and does not compile).

MICO and OmniORB are both working and licensed under LGPL.  Perhaps we should 
include one of them?  MICO is stable and well known, and several books have 
been written about it, so it would seem to be a good first choice.  However, 
OmniORB has both C++ and Python bindings, and so it might be more useful for 
Fedora (although ORBit also has Python bindings, so that point may be moot).

-- Benjamin Kreuter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux